Griffiths inequalities

Positivity and monotonicity properties of spin correlations for the finite-volume ferromagnetic Ising model.
Griffiths inequalities

Statement

Let Λ\Lambda be a finite set of sites with Ising spins σi{1,+1}\sigma_i\in\{-1,+1\}, and consider the finite-volume ferromagnetic with Hamiltonian

HΛ(σ)={i,j}ΛJijσiσjiΛhiσi, H_\Lambda(\sigma) = -\sum_{\{i,j\}\subset \Lambda} J_{ij}\,\sigma_i\sigma_j - \sum_{i\in\Lambda} h_i\,\sigma_i,

where the couplings satisfy Jij0J_{ij}\ge 0 (ferromagnetic) and the external fields satisfy hi0h_i\ge 0.

Let μΛ\mu_\Lambda be the associated and write Λ\langle \cdot\rangle_\Lambda for expectation (see ). For AΛA\subset\Lambda, define the spin monomial σA:=iAσi\sigma_A := \prod_{i\in A}\sigma_i (with σ=1\sigma_\varnothing=1).

Griffiths inequalities:

  1. (Griffiths I) For every AΛA\subset\Lambda,

    σAΛ0. \langle \sigma_A\rangle_\Lambda \ge 0.
  2. (Griffiths II) For every A,BΛA,B\subset\Lambda,

    σAσBΛσAΛσBΛ0. \langle \sigma_A\sigma_B\rangle_\Lambda - \langle \sigma_A\rangle_\Lambda\,\langle \sigma_B\rangle_\Lambda \ge 0.

Equivalently, all covariances of spin monomials are nonnegative.

Key hypotheses and conclusions

Hypotheses

Conclusions

  • Positivity of moments: σAΛ0\langle\sigma_A\rangle_\Lambda\ge 0 for all AA.
  • Positive correlations: CovΛ(σA,σB)0\mathrm{Cov}_\Lambda(\sigma_A,\sigma_B)\ge 0 for all A,BA,B.
  • Monotonicity (useful corollary): differentiating expectations with respect to fields/couplings yields covariances, so Griffiths II implies monotonicity of σAΛ\langle\sigma_A\rangle_\Lambda in the parameters (a basic “ferromagnets align more when you increase JJ or hh” principle).

Proof idea / significance

A common route is to express derivatives of the pressure logZΛ\log Z_\Lambda (see ) in terms of truncated correlations and then prove these derivatives are nonnegative using ferromagnetic structure (e.g. random-current/high-temperature expansions or correlation-inequality arguments). In practice, Griffiths inequalities are often obtained as consequences of the stronger (and, for monotone observables, the ).

They are foundational for: