Criterion for an exact differential

Mixed-partial equality criterion for when a differential form is the differential of a state function; used to justify Maxwell relations and identify thermodynamic potentials.
Criterion for an exact differential

Statement

Let DR2D\subset\mathbb R^2 be an open, simply connected domain and let M,NC1(D)M,N\in C^1(D). Consider the 11-form

ω=M(x,y)dx+N(x,y)dy. \omega = M(x,y)\,dx + N(x,y)\,dy.

Then the following are equivalent:

  1. ω\omega is exact: there exists a scalar potential FC2(D)F\in C^2(D) such that dF=ωdF=\omega (i.e. xF=M\partial_x F=M and yF=N\partial_y F=N).
  2. The mixed partials satisfy My=Nxeverywhere on D. \frac{\partial M}{\partial y}=\frac{\partial N}{\partial x}\qquad\text{everywhere on }D.

Equivalently, line integrals of ω\omega are path-independent on DD.

Multivariable version (thermodynamic coordinates)

For ω=i=1nMi(x)dxi\omega=\sum_{i=1}^n M_i(x)\,dx_i with MiC1(D)RnM_i\in C^1(D)\subset\mathbb R^n on a simply connected domain, ω\omega is exact iff

Mixj=Mjxifor all i,j. \frac{\partial M_i}{\partial x_j}=\frac{\partial M_j}{\partial x_i}\qquad\text{for all }i,j.

Key hypotheses

  • Coefficients M,NM,N are continuously differentiable (at least C1C^1).
  • The domain DD is simply connected (no “holes”), ensuring that closedness implies exactness in this setting.

Key conclusions