Crooks fluctuation theorem
Setup (forward vs. reverse driving)
Consider a system coupled to a heat bath at temperature (inverse temperature ), initially prepared in equilibrium for a control parameter value . The system is then driven by an externally prescribed protocol from to (the forward process). Define the time-reversed protocol (the reverse process), with the reverse experiment initialized in equilibrium at .
- Equilibrium initialization and free energy: canonical ensemble , canonical partition function , Helmholtz free energy , temperature .
- Nonequilibrium work viewpoint: work distribution , free-energy difference from nonequilibrium work .
Let denote the work performed on the system during a single realization of the forward protocol, and let be its probability density. Let be the work density in the reverse protocol (defined with the same sign convention for work on the system).
Theorem (Crooks fluctuation theorem)
Assume microreversibility (time-reversal symmetry of the underlying dynamics) and consistent thermal contact with the bath (e.g., Markovian dynamics satisfying local detailed balance; see detailed balance ). Then the forward and reverse work distributions satisfy
where is the equilibrium Helmholtz free-energy difference.
Equivalently, in terms of dissipated work ,
Key consequences
1) Jarzynski equality (corollary)
Integrating the Crooks relation over yields
which is the Jarzynski equality (see also Jarzynski equality (concept) ).
2) Crossing criterion for estimating
The forward and reverse distributions cross at the reversible work value:
This gives an operational way to extract from nonequilibrium sampling.
3) Second-law inequality from convexity
By Jensen’s inequality applied to the Jarzynski equality,
consistent with the second law and the role of dissipation.
Information-theoretic refinements often express average dissipation as a relative entropy between forward and reverse path measures (see relative entropy (KL divergence) ).