Statement

Every is an . Explicitly, if AA is nuclear and

0IBB/I00\longrightarrow I\longrightarrow B\longrightarrow B/I\longrightarrow 0

is a of CC^*-algebras]], then

0IminABminA(B/I)minA00\longrightarrow I\otimes_{\min}A\longrightarrow B\otimes_{\min}A\longrightarrow (B/I)\otimes_{\min}A \longrightarrow 0

is exact. Nuclearity is strictly stronger: exactness alone neither forces the minimal and with AA to agree nor supplies completely positive finite-dimensional approximations Brown–Ozawa, Proposition 2.3.8.

Proof idea

Nuclearity identifies the minimal tensor product with a tensor product whose quotient behavior is controlled by completely positive approximations. Equivalently, approximate the identity map on AA pointwise in norm by through matrix algebras. Tensoring those factorizations with the given extension reduces the kernel calculation to matrix amplifications, which preserve exactness. Passing to the point-norm limit proves that the kernel in BminAB\otimes_{\min}A is exactly IminAI\otimes_{\min}A.

Strictness of the implication

Commutative CC^*-algebras and compact-operator algebras are nuclear, hence exact. The converse fails: Cr(F2)C_r^*(\mathbb F_2), the of the on two generators, is exact but not nuclear. In the reduced group setting, nuclearity detects amenability, whereas exactness holds for a broader class of groups Brown–Ozawa, §§2.3 and 5.1.

Logical role

This result is an implication between properties, not an alternative definition of nuclearity. In arguments about extensions, exactness is often the precise hypothesis needed; assuming nuclearity may introduce unnecessary structure.

References
  1. Nathanial P. Brown and Narutaka Ozawa, C-Algebras and Finite-Dimensional Approximations*, American Mathematical Society, 2008. AMS DOI record. Relevant: §2.3, especially Proposition 2.3.8, on nuclearity and exactness.