On a (M,g)(M,g) of signature (1,n−1)(1,n-1), the d’Alembert operator or wave operator is

□gf=−tr⁡g(∇df)=−1∣det⁡g∣ ∂μ ⁣(∣det⁡g∣ gμν∂νf).\Box_g f=-\operatorname{tr}_g(\nabla df) =-\frac{1}{\sqrt{|\det g|}}\, \partial_\mu\!\left(\sqrt{|\det g|}\,g^{\mu\nu}\partial_\nu f\right).

It is the Lorentzian instance of the in the sign convention adopted here.

Minkowski form

On with

g=diag⁡(−1,1,…,1),g=\operatorname{diag}(-1,1,\ldots,1),

one has

□g=∂t2−∑j=1n−1∂xj2.\Box_g=\partial_t^2-\sum_{j=1}^{n-1}\partial_{x_j}^2.

Its is

σ2(□g)(x,ξ)=−gx−1(ξ,ξ),\sigma_2(\Box_g)(x,\xi)=-g_x^{-1}(\xi,\xi),

which vanishes exactly on null covectors. Thus □g\Box_g is hyperbolic rather than elliptic.

Geometric role

The operator is . A hypersurface is characteristic for □g\Box_g precisely where its conormal covector is null. This local symbol statement is distinct from the global and the , which require .

Sign convention

Many authors define □g=tr⁡g∇d\Box_g=\operatorname{tr}_g\nabla d. With the same metric signature their operator is the negative of this one. The displayed Minkowski formula, not the symbol □\Box by itself, fixes the convention.

References
  1. Christian Bär, Nicolas Ginoux, and Frank Pfäffle, Wave Equations on Lorentzian Manifolds and Quantization, European Mathematical Society, 2007. Publisher record. Relevant: §§1.5 and 3.2.
  2. Lars Hörmander, The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators III, Springer, 1985. Publisher record. Relevant: Chapter XXIII.