Statement

Let π\pi be a strongly continuous unitary representation of a finite-dimensional Lie group GG on HH. For X∈gX\in\mathfrak g, let KX=iAXK_X=iA_X be the maximal skew-adjoint of t↦π(exp⁡(tX))t\mapsto\pi(\exp(tX)). Then its is exactly

H∞=⋂r≥1 ⋂X1,…,Xr∈gDom⁡(KX1⋯KXr).H^\infty= \bigcap_{r\geq1}\ \bigcap_{X_1,\ldots,X_r\in\mathfrak g} \operatorname{Dom}(K_{X_1}\cdots K_{X_r}).

Products use the usual domains of , with the rightmost factor applied first.

What a product domain requires

For example,

Dom⁡(KXKY)={v∈Dom⁡(KY):KYv∈Dom⁡(KX)}.\operatorname{Dom}(K_XK_Y) =\{v\in\operatorname{Dom}(K_Y):K_Yv\in\operatorname{Dom}(K_X)\}.

It is not enough that vv separately belong to both generator domains. Requiring the analogous condition for all finite words supplies one common domain closed under every derived action.

Finite differentiability

The is the intersection of these domains for 1≤r≤k1\leq r\leq k. In particular, first derivatives in all directions give H1H^1, not automatically H∞H^\infty. The restriction to a finite-dimensional Lie group is part of the statement; arbitrary infinite-dimensional groups require additional hypotheses.

Relation to a single regularity operator

The same smooth space is the intersection of the domains of all powers of the closed . The word-domain formulation records each infinitesimal direction, while the Laplacian packages the regularity into one operator.

References
  1. Karl-Hermann Neeb, On Differentiable Vectors for Representations of Infinite Dimensional Lie Groups. Definition 3.1(c)–(d), Theorem 9.4, specialized to finite-dimensional groups.