Statement

Let GG be a second-countable , let HKGH\subseteq K\subseteq G be closed subgroups, and let σ\sigma be a of HH. Induction in stages is the natural unitary equivalence

IndHGσ  IndKG(IndHKσ).\operatorname{Ind}_H^G\sigma \ \simeq\ \operatorname{Ind}_K^G\bigl(\operatorname{Ind}_H^K\sigma\bigr).

Here every induction is the constructed from the canonical quasi-invariant measure class on the relevant . The equivalence is canonical up to the harmless choices used to realize those measure classes and intertwines the GG-actions.

Geometric mechanism

The quotient map G/HG/KG/H\to G/K has fibers modeled on K/HK/H. Disintegrating a measure in the class on G/HG/H first over G/KG/K and then over K/HK/H identifies an L2L^2-section over G/HG/H with an L2L^2-section over G/KG/K whose values are themselves L2L^2-sections over K/HK/H. The Radon–Nikodym and factors combine exactly to give the direct-induction normalization Folland, Chapter 6, “Pseudomeasures and Induction in Stages”.

Consequences

The theorem permits a complicated inducing subgroup to be approached through an intermediate subgroup without changing the resulting representation. In real reductive groups it is the formal reason that induction from a parabolic can be decomposed through a larger parabolic, with the appropriate normalized induction at each step. It also makes the assignment of induction functors coherent for longer chains of closed subgroups.

Finite-group model and analytic content

For finite groups, the equivalence reduces to the associativity isomorphism

C[G]C[K](C[K]C[H]V)C[G]C[H]V.\mathbb C[G]\otimes_{\mathbb C[K]} \bigl(\mathbb C[K]\otimes_{\mathbb C[H]}V\bigr) \cong \mathbb C[G]\otimes_{\mathbb C[H]}V.

For locally compact groups, tensor associativity alone does not prove the Hilbert-space statement: quotient measures, completion, and modular corrections are essential parts of the theorem.

References
  1. Gerald B. Folland, A Course in Abstract Harmonic Analysis, 2nd ed., CRC Press, 2016. DOI record. Relevant: Chapter 6, section “Pseudomeasures and Induction in Stages.”
  2. George W. Mackey, The Theory of Unitary Group Representations, University of Chicago Press, 1976. Library record. Relevant: Chapter 3 on induced representations and induction in stages.