For a complex EE, its continuous anti-dual is

E×={λ:E→C:λ is continuous and conjugate-linear}.E^\times=\{\lambda:E\to\mathbb C:\lambda\text{ is continuous and conjugate-linear}\}.

Conjugate-linearity means λ(av+bw)=a‾λ(v)+b‾λ(w)\lambda(av+bw)=\overline a\lambda(v)+\overline b\lambda(w). Pointwise addition and scalar multiplication make E×E^\times a complex vector space. Its strong anti-dual topology is uniform convergence on bounded subsets, with seminorms

qB(λ)=sup⁡w∈B∣λ(w)∣.q_B(\lambda)=\sup_{w\in B}|\lambda(w)|.

This is the anti-linear version of the .

Hilbert-space embedding

Use an linear in its first argument. If E↪HE\hookrightarrow H is continuous and dense, then

j:H⟶E×,j(v)(w)=⟨v,w⟩Hj:H\longrightarrow E^\times,\qquad j(v)(w)=\langle v,w\rangle_H

is a continuous linear injection. Indeed, qB(j(v))≤∥v∥sup⁡w∈B∥w∥q_B(j(v))\leq\|v\|\sup_{w\in B}\|w\|, and density proves injectivity.

Relation to the linear dual

The map λ↦λ‾\lambda\mapsto\overline\lambda, with λ‾(w)=λ(w)‾\overline\lambda(w)=\overline{\lambda(w)}, identifies the anti-dual conjugate-linearly with the . Thus linear and anti-linear distribution conventions differ by complex conjugation. The anti-dual convention makes jj linear without choosing a conjugation on HH.