Theorem
Uniqueness against a smooth compactly supported reference flow
A smooth bounded-energy competitor agrees with a smooth compact reference solution with the same data and force.
Statement
Let be a smooth Navier–Stokes solution on , , with the velocity supported in one fixed compact spatial set. If is another smooth solution with the same viscosity, force and initial velocity, and , then . The pressure may have unrestricted spatial growth.
This is a comparison theorem using localized difference energy, not an existence assertion.
Pressure first
Set and . Uniform bounds give . Pressure-gradient identification replaces by the canonical pressure gradient. Pairing this distributional identity with compactly supported time-space tests replaces the pressure flux in the energy identity by its canonical counterpart for almost every time.
Absorb the boundary fluxes
Choose near the unit ball, , and set
The cutoff Sobolev bound gives . For large , the reference velocity vanishes on the cutoff's derivative support, so the transport flux is at most ; the Laplacian flux is at most . The pressure estimate contributes only powers of . Absorb each subquadratic power into . Constants may depend on and the competitor's energy bound, but not on . The result is
Since , Gronwall gives . On every fixed ball the cutoff equals one for sufficiently large ; taking proves . Smoothness extends the equality to every time. No global gradient bound for the competitor was assumed.