Statement

Let (u,p)(u,p) be a smooth Navier–Stokes solution on R3×[0,T]\mathbb R^3\times[0,T], ν>0\nu>0, with the velocity supported in one fixed compact spatial set. If (v,P)(v,P) is another smooth solution with the same viscosity, force and initial velocity, and vLtLx2v\in L^\infty_tL^2_x, then v=uv=u. The pressure PP may have unrestricted spatial growth.

This is a comparison theorem using , not an existence assertion.

Pressure first

Set w=vuw=v-u and g=vvuug=v\otimes v-u\otimes u. Uniform L2L^2 bounds give gLtLx1g\in L^\infty_tL^1_x. Pressure-gradient identification replaces (Pp)\nabla(P-p) by the canonical pressure gradient. Pairing this distributional identity with compactly supported time-space tests replaces the pressure flux in the energy identity by its canonical counterpart for almost every time.

Absorb the boundary fluxes

Choose ϕ=1\phi=1 near the unit ball, 0ϕ10\le\phi\le1, and set

ER=ϕR8w2,AR=ϕR4w2,BR=ϕR4w6.E_R=\int\phi_R^8|w|^2,\quad A_R=\|\phi_R^4\nabla w\|_2,\quad B_R=\|\phi_R^4w\|_6.

The cutoff Sobolev bound gives BRC(AR+R1w2)B_R\le C(A_R+R^{-1}\|w\|_2). For large RR, the reference velocity vanishes on the cutoff's derivative support, so the transport flux is at most CR1BR3/2C R^{-1}B_R^{3/2}; the Laplacian flux is at most CR2C R^{-2}. The pressure estimate contributes only powers 3/2,1/2,3/43/2,1/2,3/4 of BRB_R. Absorb each subquadratic power into νAR2/2\nu A_R^2/2. Constants may depend on T,ν,uT,\nu,u and the competitor's energy bound, but not on RR. The result is

12ER+ν2AR2uER+C/R.\frac12 E_R'+\frac\nu2 A_R^2\le\|\nabla u\|_\infty E_R+C/R.

Since ER(0)=0E_R(0)=0, Gronwall gives ER(t)CT/RE_R(t)\le C_T/R. On every fixed ball the cutoff equals one for sufficiently large RR; taking RR\to\infty proves w=0w=0. Smoothness extends the equality to every time. No global gradient bound for the competitor was assumed.