Tensorial forms and ad(P)-valued forms
Let be a principal G-bundle over a smooth manifold , where is a Lie group with Lie algebra .
The adjoint bundle of is the associated vector bundle
where acts on by the adjoint representation .
A -valued differential k-form is called tensorial of type if it satisfies:
- Horizontality: whenever at least one (i.e., a vertical tangent vector).
- Equivariance: for every , where is the right action.
Write for the vector space of such tensorial forms.
Theorem (TFAE: tensorial forms vs ad(P)-valued forms)
There is a natural vector space isomorphism
More explicitly:
Given , define by
where satisfies , and are any tangent vectors with . This is well-defined because vertical components do not affect (horizontality) and changing in the fiber changes by (equivariance), exactly matching the associated-bundle identification.
Conversely, given , define by requiring that for and ,
This forces to be horizontal, and the associated-bundle relation forces -equivariance.
These constructions are inverse to each other and are natural with respect to bundle morphisms covering the identity on .
A key application is that the curvature of a principal connection is tensorial of type , hence canonically corresponds to an -valued 2-form on the base.
Examples
Curvature descends to the base.
If is a principal connection on with curvature , then is horizontal and -equivariant. The theorem identifies with a unique element of .Trivial bundle case.
On the trivial principal bundle , the adjoint bundle is canonically isomorphic to . Under this identification, a tensorial corresponds to an ordinary -valued form on (written in a chosen global section), and the correspondence is given by pullback along the section and associated-bundle identification.Scalar “basic” forms as a special case.
If one replaces by a trivial -representation (so equivariance becomes -invariance), then horizontal -invariant forms on correspond exactly to ordinary differential forms on via pullback along .