Lemma: Chern–Weil forms are basic
This lemma explains why the Chern–Weil construction produces differential forms on the base manifold from data on the total space.
Let be a principal G-bundle , let be a principal connection on , and let be its curvature 2-form .
Let denote an -invariant symmetric multilinear polynomial of degree on , so that the Chern–Weil form on the total space is
Statement
The form is basic on in the sense of basic differential forms on a principal bundle . Concretely:
Horizontality: for every fundamental vertical vector field on (see fundamental vector field convention ),
Equivalently, vanishes whenever any argument is vertical, so it is a horizontal form .
-invariance: for every ,
so it is an invariant differential form .
Therefore there exists a unique form such that ; this is the Chern–Weil form on the base.
Proof idea
- The curvature is horizontal: for all fundamental vertical . Multilinearity of then implies .
- The curvature transforms by the adjoint action: (using the adjoint action ). Since is -invariant, applying yields .
Examples
Abelian case: For , the adjoint action is trivial, and can be taken to be the identity on . Then the Chern–Weil form is simply , and the lemma says is basic, hence descends to a 2-form on . This is exactly what happens in the Dirac monopole example on the Hopf bundle.
Unitary bundles For a principal -bundle, take or . The lemma guarantees that and are basic forms on , so they correspond to well-defined differential forms on representing Chern classes (see Chern class ).
Orthogonal bundles and Pontryagin forms For , invariant polynomials such as produce Pontryagin forms (see Pontryagin class ). The lemma ensures these forms are basic and hence live on the base manifold, not just on the total space of frames.