Let P→MP\to M and P′→MP'\to M be , and let Φ:P→P′\Phi:P\to P' be a over MM (a GG-equivariant with π′∘Φ=π\pi'\circ\Phi=\pi).

For every pp, the corresponding satisfies

cwp(P)=cwp(P′)∈HdR∗(M).\mathrm{cw}_p(P)=\mathrm{cw}_p(P') \in H^{*}_{\mathrm{dR}}(M).

Equivalently: choosing any connection ω\omega on PP, the pullback connection (Φ−1)∗ω(\Phi^{-1})^*\omega on P′P' has the property that the produced from ω\omega and (Φ−1)∗ω(\Phi^{-1})^*\omega represent the same de Rham class, so the classes coincide.

Examples
  1. Same bundle via different constructions. If a principal bundle is presented using two different atlases or two different cocycles related by a coboundary, the resulting bundles are isomorphic; their Chern–Weil classes coincide.
  2. Vector bundle isomorphism. If two rank-nn real vector bundles are isomorphic, their frame bundles are isomorphic as principal GL(n,R)GL(n,\mathbb R)-bundles, so all Chern–Weil classes defined from the frame bundle agree (e.g. Pontryagin classes).
  3. Pullback by a diffeomorphism. If f:N→Mf:N\to M is a diffeomorphism and P→MP\to M is a principal bundle, then f∗P→Nf^*P\to N is isomorphic to PP transported along ff, and the Chern–Weil classes transform by pullback in cohomology.