For irrational θ\theta, let Tθ(x)=x+θT_\theta(x)=x+\theta on T\mathbb T. Its is Q=T/∼Q=\mathbb T/{\sim}, where x∼yx\sim y means y=x+nθy=x+n\theta for some n∈Zn\in\mathbb Z. Every orbit is countable and dense, while QQ has many distinct points. The quotient topology on QQ is indiscrete: its only open sets are ∅\varnothing and QQ.

Why functions collapse

A continuous function constant on each orbit is constant on the dense orbit of any one point and hence on the whole circle. A nonempty proper saturated open subset would have a nonempty invariant closed complement containing a dense orbit, a contradiction. This proves the quotient-topology assertion.

Haar ergodicity also gives L∞(T)α=C1L^\infty(\mathbb T)^\alpha=\mathbb C1, even though invariant null sets such as individual orbits exist. The retains functions and implementing motion and provides a richer algebraic object associated with this quotient.

References
  1. Alain Connes, Noncommutative Geometry, 1994, Introduction, examples of quotient spaces.