Statement

For finite-dimensional Hausdorff second-countable M,NM,N, pullback gives a natural bijection

Hom⁡Man(M,N)  ≅  Hom⁡C∞Ring(C∞(N),C∞(M)),F⟼F∗.\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathbf{Man}}(M,N) \;\cong\; \operatorname{Hom}_{C^\infty\mathbf{Ring}} \bigl(C^\infty(N),C^\infty(M)\bigr), \qquad F\longmapsto F^*.

Thus the assignment

C∞(−):Manop⟶C∞RingC^\infty(-): \mathbf{Man}^{\mathrm{op}} \longrightarrow C^\infty\mathbf{Ring}

is a covariant from the of the . Equivalently, M↦C∞(M)M\mapsto C^\infty(M) is a fully faithful on Man\mathbf{Man}. One should not call the displayed functor on Manop\mathbf{Man}^{\mathrm{op}} itself contravariant.

Why a homomorphism determines a map

For each x∈Mx\in M, composing a C∞C^\infty-ring morphism φ:C∞(N)→C∞(M)\varphi:C^\infty(N)\to C^\infty(M) with evaluation at xx gives a character C∞(N)→RC^\infty(N)\to\mathbb R. Such characters are evaluations at unique points of NN. Writing that point as F(x)F(x) defines a set map F:M→NF:M\to N. In local coordinates, the coordinate functions pull back to smooth functions, which proves that FF is smooth and φ=F∗\varphi=F^*.

Essential image and limitations

The theorem is full faithfulness, not an equivalence with all . Its essential image consists precisely of those C∞C^\infty-rings isomorphic to C∞(M)C^\infty(M) for manifolds MM. Quotients with singular or infinitesimal behavior generally lie outside that image.

References
  1. Jet Nestruev, Smooth Manifolds and Observables, Springer, 2003. DOI record. Relevant: “Algebras and Points,” “Smooth Manifolds,” and “Smooth Maps.”
  2. Ieke Moerdijk and Gonzalo E. Reyes, Models for Smooth Infinitesimal Analysis, Springer, 1991. DOI record. Relevant: Chapter I, C∞C^\infty-rings and smooth loci.