Definition

Let (M,I,J,K,g)(M,I,J,K,g) be a , with ωI,ωJ,ωK\omega_I,\omega_J,\omega_K. Set, in the left-action convention,

ΩI=ωJ+iωKΩI2,0(M).\Omega_I=\omega_J+i\omega_K\in\Omega_I^{2,0}(M).

The metric gg is an HKT metrichyperkähler with torsion—if

IΩI=0.\partial_I\Omega_I=0.
Connection characterization

Equivalently, the Hermitian Bismut connections of (g,I)(g,I), (g,J)(g,J), and (g,K)(g,K) coincide. Their common connection preserves the hypercomplex triple and has totally skew-symmetric torsion. This explains the name.

Relation to hyperkähler geometry

Every is HKT with zero torsion. An HKT metric need not be hyperkähler: the individual fundamental forms need not be closed, and the Levi-Civita connection need not preserve I,J,KI,J,K. Thus HKT is an intermediate differential condition on a hyper-Hermitian metric, not an alias for either neighboring structure.

Potentials

Every HKT metric admits local potentials. More precisely, locally there is a smooth uu for which the metric is obtained from Ju\partial\partial_Ju; conversely, such a function produces an HKT metric.

Sign convention

With the right-action convention of Alesker–Verbitsky, one writes Ω=ωJiωK\Omega=\omega_J-i\omega_K. The sign changes with the action and fundamental-form conventions; the condition must be read together with the definition of Ω\Omega.

References
  1. P. S. Howe and G. Papadopoulos, “Twistor spaces for hyper-Kähler manifolds with torsion,” Physics Letters B 379 (1996), 80–86. DOI record00442-8).
  2. Semyon Alesker and Misha Verbitsky, “Plurisubharmonic functions on hypercomplex manifolds and HKT-geometry,” Journal of Geometric Analysis 16 (2006), 375–399. arXiv record.