Statement

Let FF satisfy the on an open set UR×RmU\subset\mathbb R\times\mathbb R^m. Suppose a solution on [t0,T)[t_0,T), with T<T<\infty, has its graph in a compact subset KUK\subset U. Then it extends beyond TT.

Reason

Continuity bounds FF on KK, so the solution is Lipschitz in time and has a limit yTy_T at TT. Compactness puts (T,yT)(T,y_T) inside KUK\subset U. Apply local existence there and join by uniqueness. Thus failure of continuation at a finite maximal time forces escape from every such compact subset. A bounded state does not suffice if the equation domain has a finite boundary that the trajectory approaches.

Maximal interval

The maximal existence interval through fixed initial data is the union of the intervals on which its solution can be continued. Uniqueness makes the continuations agree on overlaps. The criterion above describes an obstruction at a finite endpoint of that interval.