Saddle-point method

Asymptotic evaluation of contour integrals and coefficient formulas using stationary points of the phase.
Saddle-point method

The saddle-point method (also called steepest descent in many contexts) is a complex-analytic technique for approximating integrals like

I(n)=Γenϕ(z)ψ(z)dz I(n)=\int_{\Gamma} e^{n\phi(z)}\,\psi(z)\,dz

for large nn, where Γ\Gamma is a contour in the complex plane. It is closely related to , but uses complex contours chosen to pass through a saddle point (a stationary point of the phase).

Saddle point and quadratic approximation

A point z0z_0 is a (simple) saddle point for ϕ\phi if

ϕ(z0)=0andϕ(z0)0. \phi'(z_0)=0 \quad\text{and}\quad \phi''(z_0)\neq 0.

Under standard analyticity and contour-deformation conditions, the leading contribution to I(n)I(n) comes from a neighborhood of z0z_0. Expanding,

ϕ(z)=ϕ(z0)+12ϕ(z0)(zz0)2+, \phi(z)=\phi(z_0)+\tfrac12\phi''(z_0)(z-z_0)^2+\cdots,

and choosing Γ\Gamma along a direction of steepest descent, one typically gets a Gaussian-type leading term:

I(n)enϕ(z0)ψ(z0)2πnϕ(z0), I(n)\approx e^{n\phi(z_0)}\,\psi(z_0)\,\sqrt{\frac{2\pi}{n\,\phi''(z_0)}},

with the square root interpreted using an appropriate branch and orientation of the contour.

Coefficient asymptotics via Cauchy’s integral formula

A very common application is estimating coefficients of an analytic generating function

F(z)=n0anzn. F(z)=\sum_{n\ge 0} a_n z^n.

Cauchy’s coefficient formula gives

an=12πiF(z)zn+1dz, a_n=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\oint \frac{F(z)}{z^{n+1}}\,dz,

so the integrand can be written as exp(nϕ(z))\exp(n\phi(z)) with

ϕ(z)=1nlogF(z)logz(up to harmless constants). \phi(z)=\frac{1}{n}\log F(z) - \log z \quad\text{(up to harmless constants)}.

The saddle-point condition for the dominant radius rr (often real and positive in applications with nonnegative coefficients) becomes

ddz(logF(z)nlogz)z=r=0rF(r)F(r)=n. \frac{d}{dz}\Bigl(\log F(z) - n\log z\Bigr)\Big|_{z=r}=0 \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad \frac{r F'(r)}{F(r)} = n.

A standard “real saddle” coefficient template

Define

a(r)=rF(r)F(r),b(r)=ra(r), a(r)=\frac{rF'(r)}{F(r)},\qquad b(r)=r\,a'(r),

and let r=rnr=r_n solve a(r)=na(r)=n. Under common regularity conditions (analyticity in a neighborhood of rnr_n, suitable decay away from the saddle, and a nondegenerate saddle), one gets the asymptotic form

anF(rn)rnn2πb(rn). a_n \sim \frac{F(r_n)}{r_n^{\,n}\sqrt{2\pi\,b(r_n)}}.

This is a workhorse for asymptotics in analytic combinatorics and partition-type problems.

Relation to Laplace’s method

If one can reduce a problem to an integral with a large parameter and a single dominant stationary point, the saddle-point method is the complex analogue of . Both rely on:

  • identifying the dominant point (maximum/saddle),
  • making a local quadratic approximation,
  • evaluating a Gaussian integral.

Practical notes

  • Choosing the correct contour (often a steepest descent path) is part of the method; it ensures the contribution away from the saddle is negligible.
  • Multiple saddle points can contribute; the leading asymptotic can be a sum of saddle contributions.
  • Degenerate saddles (where ϕ(z0)=0\phi''(z_0)=0) require higher-order expansions and lead to different scaling.