Proposition
Valuations as tropical hyperfield morphisms
Negating an additive non-Archimedean valuation gives a weak morphism to a max tropical hyperfield.
Statement
Let be a valuation on a field, where is a totally ordered abelian group, written additively. Give tropical multiplication and max-convention hyperaddition
Then
is a weak hyperfield homomorphism.
Verification
Multiplicativity follows from . If , then
so is the unique maximum of the two target values. If the valuations tie, cancellation can only increase , so its negative lies anywhere at or below their common value. In both cases,
Converse and sign convention
Conversely, a weak hyperfield homomorphism defines an additive valuation by for and . Thus the hyperfield-morphism axiom packages the ultrametric inequality.
The minus sign is forced by the house max convention. With a min tropical hyperfield, one may instead send directly to . A multiplicative non-Archimedean absolute value maps directly to the nonnegative multiplicative presentation of the max tropical hyperfield.
Weak, not usually strong
For fixed , the source field has the singleton sum . When their tropical values tie, the target hyper-sum is an entire lower interval, so its image is usually a proper subset. The map is therefore weak and generally not strong.
References
- Oleg Viro, “Hyperfields for Tropical Geometry I: Hyperfields and dequantization,” 2010. arXiv:1006.3034. Relevant: tropical hyperfields and non-Archimedean norms.
- Matthew Baker and Nathan Bowler, “Matroids over hyperfields,” 2017. arXiv:1601.01204. Relevant: hyperfield homomorphisms and the tropical hyperfield.