Statement

On the common carrier R{}\mathbb R\cup\{-\infty\}, the Tsemi\mathbb T_{\mathrm{semi}} and the Thyp\mathbb T_{\mathrm{hyp}} have the same multiplicative operation xy=x+yx\odot y=x+y, the same multiplicative identity 00, and the same absorbing/additive-zero element -\infty. Their additions agree on unequal inputs and differ precisely at a tie:

xy=max(x,y),xy={{max(x,y)},xy,{z:zx},x=y.x\oplus y=\max(x,y), \qquad x\boxplus y= \begin{cases} \{\max(x,y)\},&x\ne y,\\ \{z:z\le x\},&x=y. \end{cases}
Idempotence versus cancellation

In the semifield, xx=xx\oplus x=x; addition is single-valued and idempotent. In the hyperfield,

xx={z:zx}x\boxplus x=\{z:z\le x\}

contains -\infty, so xx is its own hyper-additive inverse. The lower values represent possible cancellation when two terms have equal leading valuation.

Order warning

The semifield's natural order is defined algebraically by xy    xy=yx\le y\iff x\oplus y=y, and in the max presentation it is the usual order. The hyperfield uses that same external order to describe its tied hyper-sum, but hyperaddition itself is not a join operation and does not make the hyperfield an .

In the min-plus presentation all displayed numerical inequalities reverse. One must switch both the distinguished infinity and the order convention, not merely replace the word “max” by “min.”

Pointwise inclusion is not structural identity

After replacing a semifield sum by its singleton, one does have the pointwise inclusion

{xy}xy.\{x\oplus y\}\subseteq x\boxplus y.

At a tie this inclusion is proper. It does not make one tropical object a subobject of the other: one addition has values in the carrier and the other in its nonempty power set, so the structures live in different categories. Constructions that need linear optimization often use the semifield, while valuation cancellation and matroids over hyperfields use the hyperfield.

References
  1. Oleg Viro, “Hyperfields for Tropical Geometry I: Hyperfields and dequantization,” 2010. arXiv:1006.3034. Relevant: tropical semiring and hyperfield presentations.
  2. Jaiung Jun, “Algebraic Geometry Over Hyperrings,” Advances in Mathematics 323 (2018), 142–192. arXiv:1512.04837. Relevant: the hyperfield canonically associated with a totally ordered idempotent semifield.