Four lemma
The four lemma is a pair of related statements about a commutative diagram of exact sequences. It is weaker than the five lemma (it gives injectivity or surjectivity, not necessarily an isomorphism), and it is often proved by diagram chasing using ideas similar to the snake lemma .
In categorical language, “injective/surjective” correspond to monomorphisms and epimorphisms .
Theorem (Four lemma: injective and surjective forms)
Let
be a commutative diagram of -modules with exact rows.
(1) Injective form
If is surjective and and are injective, then is injective.
(2) Surjective form
If and are surjective and is injective, then is surjective.
Combining (1) and (2) (under the usual extra hypotheses that make the “remaining” injective/surjective conditions automatic) yields the five lemma .
Examples
Injectivity in the middle when the ends are .
In many applications (e.g. long exact sequences), one works with a 5-term exact pieceand similarly for the . Then is automatically surjective and is automatically injective.
The injective form reduces to: if and are injective, then is injective.
The surjective form reduces to: if and are surjective, then is surjective.Propagation of injectivity/surjectivity through long exact Tor or Ext sequences.
Naturality gives morphisms between long exact sequences such as the long exact Tor sequence or long exact Ext sequence .
Applying the four lemma to a 5-term window inside these long exact sequences is a standard way to conclude:- a map on a “middle” or group is injective, provided the adjacent maps satisfy the injective-form hypotheses;
- or surjective, provided the adjacent maps satisfy the surjective-form hypotheses.
Homology of chain complexes: injectivity/surjectivity at one degree.
Given a morphism between long exact homology sequences arising from a short exact sequence of chain complexes , the four lemma lets one conclude that the induced mapis injective (or surjective) from corresponding injectivity/surjectivity information at neighboring degrees—often a step in proving the full isomorphism statement later via the five lemma .