Five lemma
In a morphism of exact five-term sequences, suitable isomorphism, epimorphism, and monomorphism hypotheses force the middle map to be an isomorphism.
In an abelian category, consider a commutative diagram with exact rows
If is an epimorphism, and are isomorphisms, and is a monomorphism, then is an isomorphism. In particular, if are isomorphisms, then so is .
Remarks
For modules, “epimorphism” and “monomorphism” mean surjective and injective, respectively. The result combines the injectivity and surjectivity conclusions of the four lemma.
See also five lemma corollary for standard “short exact sequence” consequences.
Examples
- Two-out-of-three for quasi-isomorphisms in a short exact sequence of complexes. Suppose are short exact sequences of chain complexes, and we have a morphism between them inducing a commutative diagram of long exact sequences in homology. If the induced maps and are isomorphisms for all , then the induced maps are isomorphisms for all , by applying the five lemma degree-by-degree to the long exact homology sequences.
- Comparing Tor groups via a map of short exact sequences. Given a morphism between short exact sequences and a fixed module , naturality of the long exact Tor sequence gives a morphism of long exact sequencesIf the induced maps and are isomorphisms for all relevant neighboring terms (for instance, if and are isomorphisms), then the five lemma implies is an isomorphism as well.
- Comparing Ext groups (same pattern). With the same setup, applying the long exact Ext sequence and using the five lemma shows that if the induced maps on the surrounding and terms are isomorphisms, then the middle -map is an isomorphism. This is a standard way to propagate isomorphisms through long exact sequences.