Let RR be a , not necessarily commutative. Then there exist simple Artinian rings R1,,RtR_1,\dots,R_t such that

RR1××Rt.R \cong R_1 \times \cdots \times R_t .

Moreover, each RiR_i is a matrix ring over a division ring: RiMni(Di)R_i \cong M_{n_i}(D_i). This refinement is exactly the content of the , and the simple-factor description is packaged in .

If RR is also , then every simple Artinian factor must be a (since a commutative division ring is a field, and commutativity forces ni=1n_i=1). Hence in the commutative case,

RK1××KtR \cong K_1 \times \cdots \times K_t

for fields KiK_i.

Interpretation

The theorem expresses RR as a finite product of rings with no nontrivial two-sided ideals. In the commutative case, those simple factors are exactly fields.

Examples
  1. Squarefree integers (commutative case). By the , Z/6ZZ/2Z×Z/3Z\mathbb Z/6\mathbb Z \cong \mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z \times \mathbb Z/3\mathbb Z. Both factors are fields, so Z/6Z\mathbb Z/6\mathbb Z is a commutative semisimple Artinian ring.
  1. Finite products of fields. For any field kk, the ring k×k×kk \times k \times k is semisimple Artinian (each factor is simple Artinian), and it is already presented in the product form of the theorem.
  1. An Artinian ring that is not semisimple. The ring Z/4Z\mathbb Z/4\mathbb Z is Artinian, but it is not semisimple: the class of 22 is nonzero and nilpotent since 22=02^2=0 mod 44. Equivalently, its is nonzero, so it cannot be semisimple.