Let O\mathcal O be an in a . A II of O\mathcal O is proper for O\mathcal O if its satisfies

(I:I)=O.(I:I)=\mathcal O.

Here “proper” records the exact ring of scalars preserving II. It does not mean I⊊OI\subsetneq\mathcal O; in particular O\mathcal O itself is proper in this sense.

Invertibility

Every is proper, by multiplying xI⊆IxI\subseteq I by its inverse. For orders in quadratic number fields, the converse holds as well. This equivalence is special to the quadratic-order setting and should not be used for arbitrary higher-degree orders.

Example

For O=Z[−3]\mathcal O=\mathbb Z[\sqrt{-3}], the ideal I=(2,1+−3)I=(2,1+\sqrt{-3}) has multiplier ring Z[(1+−3)/2]\mathbb Z[(1+\sqrt{-3})/2], so it is not proper for O\mathcal O. As an ideal of the larger ring, it is principal and proper.

References
  1. Andrew Sutherland, MIT 18.783 Lecture 18, §18.3 and Theorem 18.10, imaginary quadratic orders.
  2. John Voight, Quaternion Algebras, author's text, Exercise 16.16(b), properness and invertibility for quadratic orders.