Let kk be an algebraically closed . The weak Nullstellensatz states that every maximal ideal mk[x1,,xn]\mathfrak m\subset k[x_1,\dots,x_n] has the form

m=(x1a1,,xnan).\mathfrak m = (x_1-a_1,\dots,x_n-a_n).

for a unique point a=(a1,,an)kna=(a_1,\dots,a_n)\in k^n. Thus the of k[x1,,xn]k[x_1,\dots,x_n] is naturally identified with knk^n, and the at every maximal ideal is canonically kk.

Geometric interpretation

Under this identification, the subspace topology induced from the on agrees with the usual “vanishing set” Zariski topology on knk^n.

Examples
  1. One variable. In C[x]\mathbb C[x], every maximal ideal is of the form (xa)(x-a) for a unique aCa \in \mathbb C.
  1. Two variables. In C[x,y]\mathbb C[x,y], the ideal (x1,  y+2)(x-1,\; y+2) is maximal and corresponds to the point (1,2)C2(1,-2) \in \mathbb C^2.
  1. A non-maximal ideal and the points above it. In C[x]\mathbb C[x], the ideal (x2+1)(x^2+1) is not maximal because x2+1=(xi)(x+i)x^2+1=(x-i)(x+i). The maximal ideals containing (x2+1)(x^2+1) are (xi)(x-i) and (x+i)(x+i), corresponding to the two points ii and i-i.