Localization preserves prime ideals
Prime ideals behave well under localization : if a prime ideal does not meet the elements being inverted, then it stays prime after localization. This is one half of the prime correspondence under localization .
Theorem
Let be a commutative ring , let be a multiplicative set in , and let be a prime ideal of such that .
Then the extended ideal
is a prime ideal of .
Moreover, is precisely the kernel of the canonical map
and contracting back recovers :
If , then (so there is no corresponding prime in the localization), which explains the disjointness hypothesis.
Examples
Localizing at a prime.
Let and , so . The prime ideals of are and for primes . One checks:- , so extends to the (unique) maximal ideal , which is prime.
- If , then (since ), so becomes the unit ideal after localization.
- Also , so extends to in .
Inverting a variable in a polynomial ring.
Let and , so . The ideal is prime and disjoint from (since no power of lies in ), hence is prime in .
By contrast, the prime ideal meets (it contains ), so .Localization at a prime and the resulting local ring.
If is a prime ideal of and , then is the localization $R_{\mathfrak p}$ , which is a local ring . The extension becomes the unique maximal ideal of , and it is prime by the theorem.
For the full bijective correspondence between primes of and primes of disjoint from , see the localization prime correspondence .