Going-down theorem

For certain integral extensions (e.g. with integrally closed base), prime chains descend inside a fixed prime upstairs.
Going-down theorem

For an ABA\subseteq B, the says prime inclusions downstairs can be lifted to prime inclusions upstairs. The going-down phenomenon is the opposite direction: once you have fixed a prime upstairs lying over a larger prime downstairs, you can descend to primes lying over smaller primes.

Theorem (Going down).
Let ABA\subseteq B be an of integral domains. Assume that AA is an . Let pp\mathfrak p\subseteq \mathfrak p' be prime ideals of AA, and let qSpec(B)\mathfrak q'\in \operatorname{Spec}(B) satisfy qA=p\mathfrak q'\cap A=\mathfrak p'. Then there exists a prime ideal qB\mathfrak q\subseteq B such that

qqandqA=p. \mathfrak q\subseteq \mathfrak q' \qquad\text{and}\qquad \mathfrak q\cap A=\mathfrak p.

Equivalently, any chain of primes in AA can be realized as the contraction of a chain inside Spec(B)\operatorname{Spec}(B) that ends at a prescribed prime lying over the top prime in the chain.

The integrally closed hypothesis is essential: for general integral extensions, going-down can fail, even though and always hold.

Examples

  1. A Dedekind-domain example.
    The domain Z\mathbb Z is , and ZZ[i]\mathbb Z\subset\mathbb Z[i] is integral. Take the chain (0)(5)(0)\subset (5) in Z\mathbb Z and the prime q=(2+i)Z[i]\mathfrak q'=(2+i)\subset \mathbb Z[i] lying over (5)(5). Going-down provides a prime q(2+i)\mathfrak q\subset (2+i) with qZ=(0)\mathfrak q\cap\mathbb Z=(0); necessarily q=(0)\mathfrak q=(0).

  2. From k[t2]k[t^2] to k[t]k[t].
    Let A=k[t2]A=k[t^2] and B=k[t]B=k[t] for a kk. Since Ak[s]A\cong k[s] is a PID, it is , and ABA\subset B is integral. For the chain (0)(t2)(0)\subset (t^2) in AA and the prime (t)B(t)\subset B lying over (t2)(t^2), going-down yields (0)(t)(0)\subset (t) inside BB.

  3. A quadratic integral extension of a PID.
    Let A=k[x]A=k[x] and B=k[x,y]/(y2x)B=k[x,y]/(y^2-x). The ring AA is a PID, hence , and BB is integral over AA. For the chain (0)(x)(0)\subset (x) in AA and the prime (x,y)B(x,y)\subset B lying over (x)(x), going-down produces a prime inside (x,y)(x,y) contracting to (0)(0); again this is (0)(0).